200 Hospital Jobs Face Axe plus 95 Beds York Hospital |
That will mean a strict limit on the number of patients allowed at the hospital for surgery, with some emergency patients even sent elsewhere if no beds are available. Chief executive Jim Easton said patients whose lives were at risk would not be turned away from accident and emergency. But others, who could be coming in for an urgent but non life-threatening condition, may have to go either to another hospital or medical centre. He said: "This is new for York - but it does happen in other parts of the NHS. advertisement "Only having capacity to deal with a certain number of patients, we will find ourselves in the same position as many other hospitals. But we wouldn't put someone's life at risk through these measures." Most of the bed losses will happen early in the new financial year, probably in May. The 200 jobs will be shed over the course of the year through vacancy control, not through redundancy. There will also be limits on how many patients can have surgery. That will mean any extra referrals from doctors will have to be sent to the PCT for a decision. Bosses there may allow extra patients to be operated on in York, or may decide to send them elsewhere. Mr Easton said it was not yet known which areas of the hospital would see beds being cut. The vacancy freeze comes on top of last year's announcement that 200 jobs would be shed this year. It will mean staff will relocate to other parts of the hospital as posts become free through natural turnover, with measures put in place to protect frontline staff. Mr Easton said: "The key issue is that we are comfortable when we make these changes that we can continue to provide really excellent care for the patients we are commissioned to treat. "When I talk to staff, there's a great appreciation of the challenge facing us because of the PCT's financial problems. I think staff will be reassured that we're not moving to redundancies." York Hospital Unison representative Edna Mulhearn said: "I would think this news is very bad for the people of York and the patients of this hospital." LAST April, we reported how York Hospital was having to cut back on 200 posts this year, to save cash. Bosses told The Press they were making the move to save £2.5 million from the organisation's books. Chief executive Jim Easton said there were national requirements to make efficiency savings. Severe financial problems facing the now defunct Selby and York Primary Care Trust were also a factor. At the time, he said: "This is difficult news for the trust, particularly when we are already an efficient hospital and have managed our finances well while improving the services we deliver." We reported how every year about 400 jobs normally became vacant at York Hospital. Some Comments: 1. I just fail to understand how reducing beds is the right thing to do. 2. It's time the goverment called it a day and closed the NHS. People could then use their national insurence to pay for healthcare insurence and get a better standard of care 3. This is nothing short of scandalous and yet no one seems to be doing anything about it. I may be being stupid, but my understanding is that the YDH are closing beds because they will suffer a drop in their income from the PCT who cannot afford to pay for the treatment of all the people who need it. If this understanding is correct, who is going to pay for the treatment out of the area at other hospitals/medical centres? The treatment fairy? The reality is, I would guess that if there's no bed at York, there's no treatment.
|
|